Peptide index

Every entry on this page links to a dedicated reference page for one peptide. The reference pages all follow the same structure: an at-a-glance summary, a worked reconstitution example with realistic numbers, common reconstitution and storage notes, tracking and rotation tips, and a frequently-asked-questions block addressing the math errors people most often run into.

The peptides are grouped by category — incretin mimetics, growth-hormone-related peptides, healing and tissue-repair peptides, and so on — so a related set of molecules is always nearby for cross-reference. Each card on this page shows the peptide name, any common alias, and a one-line plain-English summary so you can scan without clicking.

Nothing on this site is a recommendation, prescription, or substitute for clinical guidance. The reference pages exist to help you do the math correctly, label vials consistently, and keep an honest log — not to suggest that any peptide is appropriate for any particular person or goal.

The top of every reference page is a pre-filled reconstitution calculator using illustrative numbers for that peptide. It's there so you can see the math in motion immediately and adjust the inputs to match your own vial without leaving the page.

Below the calculator, a long-form section walks through the molecule in plain English: what it is, the broad mechanism in non-clinical language, common reconstitution and storage notes, tracking suggestions, the mistakes that show up most often in dosing forums, and a set of FAQs.

Each page closes with a short list of related links — usually the matching guide, the calculator hub, and one or two adjacent peptide pages — so you can keep exploring without backtracking through the navigation.

Peptides are notorious for accumulating multiple names. A single molecule can have a research code (e.g. a string of letters and numbers from the original lab), an international non-proprietary name (the generic), and one or more brand names depending on who is selling the finished product. The reference pages list common aliases so the same peptide isn't missed under a different name.

When two pages look similar but appear under different names, the alias field on the card is usually the give-away. If two listings genuinely refer to the same molecule, only one canonical page exists and the others redirect there to keep the index from fragmenting search-engine signals.

Once a vial is reconstituted, its concentration is locked. Every subsequent draw uses the same mg-per-mL value. The unit count for a given dose is therefore a fixed number until the vial is empty — write it on the label and you almost never need to redo the math during that vial's life.

What does change over time is how much peptide is left. A weekly dose log decrements the vial by a known amount each shot, which is why tracking inventory matters: it's the difference between starting a fresh vial on a quiet Sunday morning and discovering an empty one mid-protocol on a busy weekday.

The per-peptide pages call out storage notes specific to each molecule, but the headline rule for almost every reconstituted peptide is the same: refrigerate, swirl rather than shake, avoid freeze–thaw cycles, and defer to the supplier's stability documentation for anything beyond the first week.

Two peptides with similar mechanisms can have very different dose ranges, frequencies, and vial sizes. Comparing them by 'milligrams per week' alone is misleading because a 0.5 mg weekly dose of one molecule and a 5 mg weekly dose of another can represent very different exposures depending on potency.

The honest way to compare is to keep each molecule's math inside its own column: dose, frequency, concentration, and units on a syringe — and to evaluate suppliers, vial sizes, and storage requirements separately rather than collapsing them into a single ranking.

Where direct comparisons are useful, they live on dedicated comparison pages rather than on the per-peptide reference pages, so the reference pages stay focused on the math for that single molecule.

Many of the molecules indexed here exist in two parallel worlds: as research compounds sold for laboratory use, and as clinically prescribed medications dispensed under regulatory oversight. The molecule is the same; the supply chain, labeling standards, and quality assurance are not. The reference pages do not blur that distinction — when a peptide has a clinical analogue, the page calls that out plainly.

Research-use vials typically arrive without dosing instructions, expiration dates calibrated to clinical handling, or printed reconstitution guidance. That is precisely why the calculators and reference pages on this site exist: to provide the math layer that the supplier's label leaves out, without crossing into clinical decisions that belong to a qualified professional.

Whatever your supply path looks like, the math is identical. A milligram is a milligram, and a unit on a U-100 syringe is the same unit no matter where the vial came from. The reference pages give you the arithmetic; the source decisions are yours to make with the right professional input.

The index covers the peptides that come up most frequently in user questions and in dose-math forums, but it is not exhaustive — and it is updated regularly as more pages are written. If a peptide you care about is missing, the calculators on the /calculators hub work for any peptide regardless of whether a dedicated reference page exists yet.

Every per-peptide reference page boils down to the same handful of fields: a vial size, a typical concentration, a typical dose, and a typical frequency. As long as you have those four numbers, the generic reconstitution and dose calculators will give you the same outputs that a dedicated page would, just without the per-peptide narrative around them.

New reference pages get added in batches. The fastest way to see one written is to check the existing pages first to make sure the peptide isn't already published under an alias — many peptides go by two or three names — and then to flag the gap through the support email in the footer.

The fastest way to use this index is to think in terms of the question you actually want answered. If the question is 'how do I reconstitute this specific vial,' click straight through to the per-peptide page and the pre-filled calculator at the top of that page will land you within a few seconds of an answer.

If the question is broader — 'how does the math work in general,' or 'why does my syringe show different units than my friend's' — start with the matching guide instead. The guides walk through the underlying arithmetic with worked examples, then point back at the calculators when you are ready to plug in your own numbers.

If the question is purely operational — 'I already understand the math, I just want a unit count for today' — skip both the per-peptide page and the guide and open the calculator hub directly. The four calculators there are designed to give a clean answer in under a minute without any narrative around them.

Most people end up using a mix of all three over time: per-peptide pages when they pick up a new vial, guides when a friend asks a question they want to answer correctly, and the calculator hub for the ongoing weekly math once the workflow is established.

Every per-peptide page is reviewed against the same checklist before it goes live: the vial-size example matches a real product on the market, the dose example sits inside the range that shows up most often in user questions, the worked unit count is verified by hand against the formulas, and the FAQ block answers questions that genuinely show up in user emails rather than ones invented for search-term coverage.

When a reader flags an error — a wrong unit count, a stale alias, a confusing sentence — the correction is logged and the page is republished with an updated 'last updated' date. Older revisions are not preserved publicly because for a math reference page the goal is one canonical current version rather than a changelog of historical drafts.

Pages also get periodic sweeps when the underlying math infrastructure changes. If, for example, the calculator hub gains a new input field or the unit-conversion helper is rewritten, every per-peptide page is re-tested against the new helpers to make sure the worked example still produces the printed answer.

The category labels on this index — incretin mimetics, growth-hormone secretagogues, healing peptides, melanocortin agonists, and so on — are organizational, not clinical. They group molecules whose math, vial sizes, and typical dosing cadences tend to look similar, so a reader who has worked through one page in a category gets a head start on the next. They are not endorsements of any particular use case, and they do not imply that the molecules inside a category are interchangeable.

Where a peptide could plausibly sit in two categories — for example, a molecule that is both a growth-hormone secretagogue and a metabolic peptide — it is filed under whichever category most closely matches how it shows up in reader questions. The alternative category is mentioned in the page body so the cross-reference is not lost. Categories are revisited whenever a new batch of pages is added, since a previously marginal grouping can become the obvious home for a peptide once enough adjacent pages exist to anchor it.

If a category seems too coarse — for example, if 'Other' is collecting peptides that clearly form their own subgroup — that is a signal that a new category is overdue, and it gets carved out in the next index update. The goal is for the categories to feel obvious in retrospect, not for any particular taxonomy to be defended for its own sake.