GH Secretagogue
CJC-1295
A GHRH analog with two distinct forms (DAC and no-DAC) that possess vastly different half-lives.
At a glance
- Category
- GH Secretagogue
- Example vial
- 2 mg
- Example diluent
- 2 mL BAC water
- Resulting concentration
- 1.00 mg/mL
Concentration
1.00 mg/mL
Draw (units)
0.01
Draw (mL)
0.000
Doses / vial
20000
- • Draw is very small — consider less diluent for better measurement accuracy.
CJC-1295 is an injectable peptide people use to nudge the body into producing more of its own growth hormone, usually for recovery, sleep quality, and body composition. It signals the pituitary to release a stronger natural GH pulse rather than adding outside hormone. In a published study, weekly CJC-1295 injections raised average IGF-1 levels by roughly 1.5 to 3-fold over 1–2 weeks. This page covers reconstitution math and typical daily or weekly logging cadence.
What CJC-1295 is
The central characteristic of CJC-1295 is its division into two functionally separate variants: one with a Drug Affinity Complex (DAC) and one without. This structural difference is not a minor detail; it fundamentally alters the peptide's half-life from several minutes to approximately one week. Consequently, any plan to study or document this compound must begin by identifying which of the two distinct versions is being used, as their administration schedules diverge completely. Failure to distinguish between the 'with DAC' and 'no-DAC' forms is the most significant source of error when logging its use.
The no-DAC version is frequently referred to in research literature as Modified GRF (1-29) or Mod GRF 1-29. It is a tetra-substituted analog of Growth Hormone Releasing Hormone (GHRH) with a very short duration of action, similar to the peptide sermorelin. Because of its transient nature, it is almost universally studied in conjunction with a ghrelin mimetic like ipamorelin to produce a synergistic effect. In contrast, the DAC variant's long-acting profile allows for much less frequent administration, fundamentally changing how protocols are structured and documented.
The historical context for CJC-1295 originates with the Canadian biotechnology firm ConjuChem, which designed the compound in the early 2000s as part of a larger strategic platform. Its core innovation was not the base GHRH analog itself (a tetrasubstituted 29-amino-acid peptide), but the inclusion of its proprietary Drug Affinity Complex (DAC) technology. This platform was engineered with the broad objective of extending the circulating half-life of various therapeutic peptides and proteins, addressing a common challenge in peptide-based drug development. The primary goal was to decrease dosing frequency by enabling the molecule to bind covalently to serum albumin, a long-lived and abundant protein in the bloodstream. Thus, CJC-1295 with DAC should be understood as one specific application of a broader pharmaceutical research strategy focused on modifying the pharmacokinetic properties of biologics.
How CJC-1295 is studied
Both forms of CJC-1295 are analogs of GHRH and function by binding to and stimulating the Growth Hormone Releasing Hormone receptor (GHRHr) in the anterior pituitary gland. Stimulation of this receptor initiates the downstream cascade that results in the synthesis and release of growth hormone. The core peptide sequence responsible for this action is the first 29 amino acids of GHRH, which is what the 'no-DAC' variant (Mod GRF 1-29) comprises, with four specific amino acid substitutions to inhibit degradation.
The key divergence occurs with the addition of the Drug Affinity Complex. The DAC version includes a lysine residue linked to maleimidopropionic acid, which forms a covalent bond with the protein serum albumin after administration. This binding protects the peptide from enzymatic degradation by dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-IV) and dramatically reduces its clearance rate by the kidneys. This novel mechanism effectively turns circulating albumin into a temporary carrier for the peptide, extending its biological half-life from mere minutes to a span of 6-8 days.
The mechanism responsible for the extended duration of CJC-1295 with DAC involves a precise and stable chemical modification. The DAC component is a specialized maleimidopropyl group that is chemically reactive towards thiol groups, such as those found on cysteine residues within proteins. In the bloodstream, this group selectively forms a strong, covalent bond with a specific cysteine residue (Cys34) of circulating albumin. Once this bond is formed, the large albumin protein effectively acts as a carrier vehicle, sterically shielding the much smaller GHRH analog from rapid enzymatic degradation and renal clearance. This process of 'albumin-hitching' is what transforms the peptide's kinetic profile, increasing its half-life from minutes to several days, a central concept researchers study when they observe its long-term activity.
How people log CJC-1295
Protocols developed for the no-DAC version (Mod GRF 1-29) are defined by frequent administration due to its rapid clearance. Dosing schedules often involve one to three administrations per day to create distinct pulses of GH release, with a common example dose being 100 mcg per instance, leading to a schedule of 7 or more administrations per week. This variant is almost always paired with a Ghrelin Receptor Agonist (a GHRP like ipamorelin) in the same syringe to amplify the pituitary's response through a secondary receptor pathway.
Conversely, protocols for CJC-1295 with DAC are structured around its long half-life, requiring much less frequent administration. A typical research schedule might involve a single administration once or twice per week, with doses that are correspondingly larger to maintain elevated GH and IGF-1 levels over the interval. The choice between these two protocols is absolute; applying a daily dosing schedule intended for the no-DAC version to the long-acting DAC version would be a significant protocol error, and vice versa.
Divergent study designs directly reflect the profound pharmacokinetic differences between the two CJC-1295 variants. Research protocols involving the no-DAC version, sometimes referred to as Mod GRF 1-29, typically schedule administrations on a daily or even multi-daily basis to account for its very short half-life and maintain stable levels for observation. As a numeric example for personal tracking, a 2 mg vial reconstituted with 2 mL would yield a concentration of 1,000 mcg/mL; a 100 mcg illustrative dose is 0.1 mL or 10 units on a U-100 syringe, logged on a daily cadence (no-DAC variant). In stark contrast, studies observing the DAC variant plan for a much lower administration frequency, often weekly, to align with its long-lasting presence in circulation.
Reconstitution notes for CJC-1295
The process to calculate the volume for a specific dose depends on the concentration of the reconstituted solution. For a numeric example, if a 2 mg vial of lyophilized CJC-1295 powder is reconstituted with 2 mL of bacteriostatic water, the resulting solution has a concentration of 1,000 mcg per mL. To draw an example dose of 100 mcg for the no-DAC variant, one would calculate the required volume as 0.1 mL, which corresponds to 10 units on a U-100 type insulin syringe.
The choice of diluent volume can be adjusted to suit the specific variant being studied. For the small, frequent 100 mcg doses of no-DAC CJC-1295, using a larger volume of diluent like 2 mL or even 3 mL can make the small dose volume easier to measure with precision. For the much larger, infrequent doses of the DAC version (e.g., 500-2000 mcg), a smaller volume of diluent, such as 1 mL, might be chosen to keep the total injection volume manageable.
A critical preliminary step before any reconstitution or use is to correctly identify and document the specific variant of CJC-1295 being handled. Vials sourced for research are typically labeled distinctly as either 'CJC-1295' (often implying the no-DAC variant, also known as Mod GRF 1-29) or explicitly as 'CJC-1295 w/ DAC' or 'CJC-1295 with DAC'. Because the administration schedule observed in research can differ by a factor of seven or more between the two, confirming this identity from the supplier documentation and vial label is essential for accurate record-keeping. Documenting the specific variant in a tracking log establishes the foundational data point upon which all subsequent scheduling and analysis depend, preventing a fundamental error in the dataset from the very beginning.
Storage and shelf life
Before it is reconstituted, the freeze-dried powder should be stored at refrigerated temperatures. After the peptide is dissolved with a diluent, the resulting solution's chemical structure is maintained by continuous refrigeration. Researchers typically plan to complete their study of a single reconstituted vial within a 30-day timeframe.
Tracking CJC-1295 in an app
When studying the no-DAC variant, which is commonly co-administered with ipamorelin, the most critical tracking detail is to record each peptide as a separate log entry. Even if both substances are drawn into and administered from a single syringe, they must be documented as two distinct events in a digital log. Failure to do this will cause the per-vial inventory count to drift within weeks, showing one vial as empty while the other is still physically present, which complicates future planning and corrupts the integrity of historical data.
For precise and auditable personal data logging, it is crucial to establish a specific entry for the subject peptide variant at the start of any documentation cycle. Modern tracking applications allow for custom fields or detailed notes where users should consistently record 'with DAC' or 'no-DAC' for their CJC-1295 supply. This single piece of metadata governs the entire planned schedule and the ultimate interpretation of any observed results over time. When reviewing logs weeks or months later, this variant information is indispensable for preventing misinterpretation of data, as the expected compound exposure from a daily versus a weekly administration schedule is fundamentally different. This simple logging practice ensures that all downstream analysis is based on a correct premise about the substance being monitored.
Background
How peptide reconstitution works in general
The same math applies to CJC-1295 as to every other lyophilized peptide. The section below is a deeper reference on the units, the formulas, and the trade-offs behind the calculator above.
What peptide reconstitution actually is
Most research peptides ship as a freeze-dried — also called lyophilized — powder sealed inside a small glass vial. The powder itself cannot be drawn into a syringe and cannot be measured by volume. Before any of that is possible, the powder has to be rehydrated by adding a precise amount of liquid. That step is reconstitution, and it is the foundation of every other calculation that follows.
The liquid added during reconstitution is almost always bacteriostatic water, often shortened to BAC water. It is sterile water that contains a very small amount of benzyl alcohol — usually 0.9 percent. The benzyl alcohol limits microbial growth inside a multi-use vial after the rubber stopper has been pierced for the first time, which is what makes BAC water different from plain sterile water for injection.
Once the powder dissolves into the BAC water, the contents of the vial become a solution with a measurable concentration. That concentration is what links the original mass on the vial label to the volume your syringe will eventually pull. Without a known concentration, every other number on a peptide page is just a guess.
The math behind every reconstitution calculator
Every reconstitution calculator on the internet — including this one — runs the same two-line equation. The first line solves for concentration. The second line solves for the volume you need to draw to hit a specific dose. The third number, units on a U-100 insulin syringe, is just that volume rescaled.
Concentration in milligrams per millilitre equals the milligrams of peptide originally in the vial divided by the millilitres of bacteriostatic water that you added. If you put 5 mg of peptide into 2 mL of BAC water, the concentration is 2.5 mg per mL. That single number now determines how every dose will be measured for the entire life of the vial.
Volume to draw in millilitres equals your desired dose in milligrams divided by that concentration. If your dose is 0.25 mg and the concentration is 2.5 mg per mL, you draw 0.1 mL. On a U-100 insulin syringe, 1 mL is 100 units, so 0.1 mL is 10 units. The calculator shows all three numbers — concentration, volume, units — at the same time so you do not have to convert manually.
There is also a fourth output: doses per vial. That is just the total milligrams in the vial divided by the milligrams in a single dose, rounded down to a whole number because a partial final dose at the bottom of a vial is rarely usable. Tracking doses per vial is what lets a logging app warn you when a vial is running low and a refill needs to be ordered.
Why bacteriostatic water volume is a real choice, not a constant
A vial label only ever tells you how much peptide is inside. It almost never tells you how much BAC water to add — because that part is up to you. Two people can take the same 5 mg vial and reconstitute it with completely different volumes of water, ending up with completely different concentrations, and both can be entirely consistent with how peptides are typically prepared.
Adding more BAC water makes each draw a larger volume in millilitres, which translates to more units on an insulin syringe. That can be useful when typical doses are very small — drawing 4 units is much easier to read accurately on a syringe than drawing 0.4 units, especially when the syringe markings are densely spaced. People often add more diluent on purpose for low-dose peptides for exactly this reason.
Adding less BAC water concentrates the solution. The same dose now occupies a smaller volume, which means fewer units on the syringe and more total doses per vial before refilling. The tradeoff is precision: at very small unit counts, a one-unit error becomes a much larger percentage error in the actual dose delivered. Picking a sensible diluent volume is a real decision that the calculator helps you simulate quickly without committing to a vial.
How insulin syringes turn millilitres into units
Almost every peptide draw is measured on an insulin syringe rather than a tuberculin syringe, because the unit markings make small volumes much easier to read. A standard U-100 insulin syringe is calibrated so that 100 units of fluid fills exactly 1 millilitre. That single relationship — 100 units equals 1 mL — is the only conversion you ever need to memorize.
From there, the math is just multiplication. A 0.5 mL draw is 50 units. A 0.1 mL draw is 10 units. A 0.05 mL draw is 5 units. The reconstitution calculator outputs both volume and units side by side so you can pick whichever number is easier to read on the syringe in your hand.
U-40 insulin syringes also exist, mostly in veterinary contexts, and use a different calibration: 40 units equals 1 mL. Mixing up a U-40 and a U-100 syringe will lead to a dose that is off by a factor of 2.5. The calculator on this page assumes U-100, which is what nearly every peptide user is actually using.
What the calculator does not do
The calculator solves the math. It does not pick a dose for you, it does not pick a frequency, it does not adjust for body weight or sensitivity, and it does not know anything about your specific situation. Those decisions belong to you and a licensed healthcare professional who can look at your bloodwork, your history, and your goals together.
It also does not validate the peptide itself. The calculator assumes the vial actually contains the milligrams printed on the label and that the peptide is properly reconstituted into a clear, fully dissolved solution. If a vial arrives clumped, cloudy, or visibly off, no amount of math fixes that. Reconstitution math only works on a vial that is in good condition to begin with.
Finally, the calculator does not log anything. Every input you type lives only on this page until you reload. The reason Peptide Pilot exists is to stop you from running these numbers from scratch every single dose: enter a vial once, and every subsequent draw, dose, and refill reminder is calculated and logged automatically.
Common CJC-1295 mistakes to avoid
- Applying a daily dosing frequency appropriate for the no-DAC variant to the long-acting DAC variant.
- Logging a co-administered dose of CJC-1295 (no-DAC) and ipamorelin as a single combined entry, which desynchronizes per-vial inventory tracking.
- Failing to explicitly document whether the 'with DAC' or 'no-DAC' version was used, rendering the log data ambiguous and difficult to interpret later.
- Confusing the terminology and assuming 'Mod GRF 1-29' is a completely different compound rather than the specific name for CJC-1295 without DAC.
- Calculating a dose for the no-DAC version (e.g., 100 mcg) but accidentally administering the DAC version, which has a profoundly different duration of action.
- Assuming all research vials labeled 'CJC-1295' are identical, without first confirming the presence or absence of the Drug Affinity Complex (DAC).
- Failing to document the specific variant (with or without DAC) at the beginning of a tracking cycle, leading to incorrect scheduling and data interpretation.
- Applying a daily administration schedule, appropriate for the no-DAC variant, to the DAC-modified version, which is observed in studies with a much longer dosing interval.
Frequently asked questions about CJC-1295
What is the functional difference between CJC-1295 with DAC and without DAC?
Why is CJC-1295 without DAC frequently paired with ipamorelin in research?
For a 2 mg vial reconstituted with 2 mL of water, how many units is a 100 mcg dose?
Is 'Mod GRF 1-29' a different peptide from CJC-1295?
What is the mechanism of the Drug Affinity Complex (DAC)?
What is the ultimate impact of logging the wrong CJC-1295 variant?
What causes the significant difference in administration frequency between CJC-1295 with DAC and without DAC?
Related on Peptide Pilot
- Open
Peptide Pilot home
Overview of the calculators, references, guides, and iPhone app.
- Open
CJC-1295 reconstitution calculator
Pre-filled calculator on its own page.
- Open
How to reconstitute peptides
Step-by-step plain-English walkthrough.
- Open
Syringe types explained
Why U-100 is the default, and what to avoid.
- Open
Ipamorelin
Same category: GH Secretagogue.
- Open
Tesamorelin
Same category: GH Secretagogue.
- Open
Sermorelin
Same category: GH Secretagogue.
Track CJC-1295 in Peptide Pilot
Log doses, sites and vials in seconds. Streaks, weight, and weekly summaries are automatic.
Download on the App Store